Implementation bottlenecks
- Python loops and interpreter overhead
- Poor memory-access patterns
- Unnecessary allocations and copies
- Vectorization opportunities
We benchmark and profile one computational workload, identify the dominant bottlenecks, and deliver a written technical report with concrete recommendations for making it faster.
Slow computational workflows can have very different causes. The expensive part might be a Python loop, memory access, CPU-GPU communication, an inefficient solver, excessive I/O, poor parallel scaling, or an inefficient algorithm.
The purpose of the Computational Performance Audit is to measure the real bottleneck first, then propose the change.
We create a technical document that your team can build on. It contains what to fix, how Open Numerics can help, and how to justify the larger engineering effort.
The most important findings in a form that can be shared with technical leadership.
A reproducible view of how the workload performs today.
A technical explanation of where time and compute are being lost.
Concrete improvements ranked by expected value and engineering effort.
Specific opportunities your team or Open Numerics can build next.
We agree on one representative computational workflow, its current performance, and the conditions under which it should be evaluated.
We reproduce the workload and measure where runtime, memory, communication and compute are actually being spent.
We look beyond individual functions and consider software, hardware, numerical methods and overall workflow architecture.
You receive the written analysis, prioritized recommendations, and implementation options, followed by a technical walkthrough of the findings.
Sometimes the right intervention changes a few lines of code. Sometimes it changes how the software uses hardware. Sometimes it changes the computational method itself.
A scientific workflow was spending most of its runtime inside nested loops over large multidimensional arrays.
Instead of adding compute, we examined how the workload accessed memory and how operations were organized across its feature, spatial and temporal dimensions.
The analysis showed that much of the computation could be expressed as vectorized array operations. The kernel was restructured around contiguous operations while retaining only the necessary outer loop.
A computational modeling pipeline had become expensive enough that runtime was limiting the speed of research and iteration.
We analyzed how computation moved through the full workflow rather than optimizing individual functions in isolation. Profiling exposed opportunities for improved parallel execution and hardware acceleration.
The resulting acceleration work combined software restructuring with parallel and GPU execution, targeted to the expensive operations that actually benefit from modern hardware.
Sometimes optimizing the implementation is not enough. The expensive operation itself has to change.
In as scientific machine learning setting, we worked on computational workflows where expensive numerical operations were repeatedly evaluated inside a larger simulation or solution process.
Rather than only making those operations execute faster, we investigated learned surrogate models that approximate the expensive computation while preserving the numerical behavior required by the surrounding workflow.
The Computational Performance Audit is a standalone engagement. Your team can use the recommendations internally, hand them to another engineering team, or ask Open Numerics to implement the highest-value improvements.
The goal is to leave you with a clearer understanding of the performance problem and a practical roadmap for solving it.
Bring us one slow simulation, numerical workflow, or computational bottleneck. In a free 30-minute technical call, we'll discuss the problem and determine whether a Computational Performance Audit is the right next step.
Discuss your workloadPrefer email? Write to info@opennumerics.com .